Meet Lavender - Weaponized A.I.

Meet Lavender, weaponized A.I. used by the government of Israel, developed in part in U.S. prior to A.I. being loosed on the public online as a parlor game several years ago.  If you are already acquainted with Lavender, maybe take the opportunity to refresh the connection based on what you may not have known.  It's elder sibling "the Gospel" and younger sibling "Where's Daddy", are briefly mentioned, in a +972 Magazine article, from 2024. 

Many people remain unaware that between 2005 and 2023, the R&D, plus field testing of the A.I. prototypes (at least in part), all were during and cause for the numerous attacks on the people and infrastructure of Gaza, within that same time frame.  That was in addition to the field testing of a variety of other weaponized technologies, including Israel's Iron Dome technology funded by U.S., and illegal use weapons there had been agreement to ban after WWII. 

The Lavender-type A.I. technology used as a weapon has long been in use on top of Israel's wall, in particular the wall that years ago contributed to turning Gaza into an open air prison, more frequently than not, as the repeated attacks on Gaza increased while R&D field testing of weapons used Gazans and the infrastructure of Gaza as targets.  Gaza since 2023 has been a televised genocide - flaunted, actually, by a lawless rogue nation, and its supporters (largely that means U.S.A. and its relentless Security Counsel vetoing). 

Lavender type A.I. technology was used to do extensive and repeated field testing damage to Palestinian lives in Gaza to prove its effectiveness, prior to 2023 by which time its use was already firmly entrenched.  During the R&D and field testing, again and again there were repeated attacks on  Gaza, as recovery work was progressing to remediate the previous damages (except for remediation of the loss of life).  The initial iterations of all three technologies were likely the prototypes tested in wars and numerous attacks on Gaza after 2005, onward,  from which "the Gospel", Lavender, and "Where's Daddy" all arose to become A.I. technology used as weapons.

From AlJazeera, "Five Israeli wars have been launched on Gaza since it disengaged from the enclave in 2005, aside from smaller incursions and bombing raids.

Before October 7, Israel said its policy was to 'mow the lawn' – attempts to degrade Hamas’s military capabilities by indiscriminately bombing Gaza every few years."

Defense is one thing.  Offense as the best defense is an entirely different circumstance, especially when propaganda presented as "intel from a  friendly nation" (so the story goes that U.S. buys into) has been believed, which pertains to the U.S. place in the Lavender story. 

The lack of veracity of information repeatedly provided to U.S. by Israel, well known to be an untrustworthy source of supposed "intel" that has been verified propaganda, oftener than not,  has been repeatedly proven through the decades.  Yet it is still denied by people who should make it a point to know better, like U.S. Congress who habitually approves military funding to Israel, knowing full well it is up to no good in the ways the funds are used. 

Who can forget the yellow cake hasbara fiasco associated with attacking Iraq, known from the start to be a bogus claim according to U.N. inspectors.  Lavender is a more recent clear example about the use A.I. was planned to be put to by the Israeli government to indiscriminately kill Palestinians.  Either that, or U.S. knowingly participated in collusion with Israel to intentionally create an A.I. weapon to be used in the genocide on Palestinians in Gaza.  

It is beyond belief that anyone  would be willing to accept that children, including toddlers and infants, are "low-ranking [. . .] potential bombing targets" (the +972 Magazine article, again), based on data about people living in Gaza that is fed into Lavender which has been programmed to determine innocents are enemies that should be killed!  Believing that is acceptable remains a fools errand for those still willing to be mislead about how A.I. was planned to be used as a genocidal weapon by Israel.

Perhaps being unaware of Lavender as an A.I. weapon is a matter of people simply not being able to comprehend the extent of evil that has been responsible for the damage that it is Lavender's fault for doing, right?  And that means people in the U.S.A., not only people in Israel, because our nation was instrumental in the R&D, field testing, and funding of the Lavender-like A.I. prototype projects, initially, that were installed on Israel's Wall.   Additionally, what shouts "taxation without representation" to the American people louder than that,  regarding the repeated funding Israel's demands that are without a moral compass?

Having been aware of U.S. involvement in the initial development of the A.I. weapons or not, it remains the responsibility of the American people to collectively put an end to U.S.A. cooperating with creating and funding Lavender-type A.I. technologies as weapons of war on Earth.  That is  especially vital when it is known from the start, in this case, they were intended to be used to destroy the lives, homes, and infrastructure of innocent people in Gaza, by testing A.I. weapons on them, then eventually using them as weapons of genocide on people in Gaza.  

Imagining that the excuse of preparing for war with Iran by creating those weapons could have been used by Israel to justify to the U.S. the killing of Palestinian people who the government of Israel has proven it considers are throw-aways, at its discretion, simply because they are Palestinian.  That is the height of what has become many crimes against humanity.  It is almost beyond imagination the U.S. would buy into cooperating with that excuse.   However, given the bizzarre and illegal rogue actions of the U.S. the past year and a half in particular that are without a moral compass or legal standing, and with the government of Israel having been trying to drum up support for its long dreamed of war with Iran so stated, repeatedly, throughout the decades, unfortunately it is not beyond imagination.  All the Israeli government needed to do was find a stooge that would buy into starting a war with  Iran, for Israel - which of course was always intended to be one of the U.S.A. administrations. 

The responsibility of we, the people, because of our own government not representing our own peoples' and nation's needs, first, continues to require a concentrated effort and push (or swift kick as the case may be) from the American people.  In this case  it is a require that our government put in place needed regulations with strict oversight, plus the will to enforce the problem of A.I. technology being  created to be used as a weapon, a for-profit weapon that has been  used for unjust illegal attacks on innocent people.  An underestimate in February 2026 of Israels damage, is the deaths of 75,000 between October 2023 up to the end of 2025, as reported by AlJazeera.  The count has held relatively steady since that time, of course with no end in sight yet, for a more realistic  update.

It is unforgivable that the use of Lavender AI technology escalated into a genocide, in which many crimes have been  acknowledged as crimes against humanity.  Those include the bombing of the hospitals, schools, and place of worship; the intentional killing of medical personnel, journalists, aid workers or arresting of those folks without charges for the purpose of torturing them in prison. Holding and torturing of prisoners remains  an ongoing crime, as are the continuing death by IDF of Palestinian people, still being reported on a daily basis - all aided by the rogue use of weaponized A.I.

U.S.A. needs to stop cooperating with what the government of Israel wants to dictate it must do for Israel.   Lavender is only one of many proofs, in one of the worst ways.  As usual, it is a "follow the money trail" issue to get to the root of corruption in U.S.A. and defang it because for-profit corruption and on-going criminality is at the foundation of what has additionally expanded into a damaging unregulated A.I. problem. 

I.C.E. at the 2026 Winter Olympics in Italy!?

 What is the purpose of ICE at the Olympics?  It is a threatening high profile criminal  "special force" that is the current U.S.A. administration's apparently lawless  "special force".   The criminal organization, ICE, has arbitrarily killed American citizens for no reason, when their supposed job is immigrants - who they also have criminally killed and jailed.

An online discussion about what Italy thinks about the problem of ICE showing up at the Olympics, included a person named "Errol" speaking on behalf of U.S.A..  When asked to comment about the name change of the U.S. Olympic house from "ICE House" to "Winter House" he stated some nonsense about it being unnecessary unless people had a negative attitude.  Then he said ICE was there to work against terrorism with international organizations, after it was already stated they were there to protect the VP's family.  Really?  Both sound like bogus prevarications, no one could believe.  Who was  he trying to fool?  The Italians did not buy it.

Why would the Italians who are hosting the Olympics not have a "negative. along with everyone else, about about U.S.A.'s I.C.E. agents showing up at the Olympics to supposedly protect the VP?  People worldwide know about the ICE criminal actions in U.S.A. so would anyone not consider it a very thinly veiled threat on the part of the current U.S. Administration, for ICE to be at the Olympics?  The Italians have a right to respond with fury, so does everyone else, given the criminality of ICE.

Why would ICE be protecting the VP's family at the Olympics instead of secret service agents assigned to them who are ordinarily not high profile.  Again what is the purpose of a threatening high profile criminal "special force" that is criminally used by the current U.S.A. administration?  

ICE, has become a criminal organization in U.S.A. that has arbitrarily killed American citizens for no reason, when their supposed job is immigration - which has also resulted in ICE killing people they have rounded up, or jailing them whether they were immigrants, citizens, tourists, or children - very young children in some cases?  How do we know those disappeared children about which there is supposedly no accountability, have not ended up as fodder for Epstein type crimes, which there is little doubt continue with other folks at the helm?  There needs to be accountability, especially for the children.

We have intelligence agencies that coordinate internationally on foreign soil.  The criminal organization ICE is not known to be one of them.  While it should be coordinating with other nations about undocumented immigrants in U.S.A., the agents have no business showing up on foreign soil, because of course it is perceived as threatening, given the ICE crimes openly perpetrated in U.S.A.  And then the excuses offered are about protecting the VP, and working with international terrorist organizations too?  The prevaricating makes ICE presence more threatening.

The Administration is apparently trying to gaslight the world about ICE presence.  An online exchange among people, noted that it is not the ICE ground troops being deployed to beat protesters, like in Minnesota (as if beating is .permissible, with no mention of murder which is worse).  It continued saying that ICE at the Olympics is a division of DHS known as "Homeland Security Investigations" that technically falls under ICE."  That sounds like totally bogus nonsense, with layer upon layer of individual departments all under DHS, then under other layers within DHS too. 

The quote is cited in an article at NBC News along with the claim of ICE being there to protect the VP and his family that states "Homeland Security Investigations is an investigative arm of DHS, and though it technically falls under ICE, it focuses on investigating transnational crime and issues with global trade or financial systems.”  We already had and still have a variety of three letter investigative agencies whose job that is.  We did not need new ones in addition, that do the same work, except they are blatantly criminal without oversight.  However, the media will report anything it is told to, unfortunately, to satisfy U.S. hybrid diversified, international, corporate conglomerate/government demands, as if it is not something that should rightfully become an investigative journalism series. 

It is the collective responsibility of we, the people, to police our own government, especially in times like these when the entire world is being threatened in some way, at least verbally, by what is difficult to describe in any other way than by a "rogue U.S. administration".  We are clearly not taking enough responsibility, collectively, as citizens.

What exactly is the new supposed international division of ICE that "technically" is a division of DHS, under ICE control?  Does Congress know anything about it, or was Congress bypassed, again, to prevent it from doing it's job?  Americans, and now people everywhere, are tired of DHS being used as a catch all for any and all crimes perpetrated by the current U.S. administration.  The numerous crimes are obviously being  perpetrated under the umbrella of "The Patriot Act". 

The Patriot Act was supposed to have been temporary when it was a bill created in Congress more than 20 years ago.  It did not have adequate oversight at the time to prevent it from being used criminally against anyone, including American citizens or people in other nations.  It was created in reaction to  9/11, and specifically stated in news reports that its purpose was not to be used against Americans,  though it could be.  Well, apparently it is now also being used as an unjustifiable excuse to target people beyond our borders - in their own nations.  

Worse there is an entire generation of young adult voters, some in their mid 20s by now, who have probably never heard of the Patriot Act, which was created before they were born.  All who wonder when fascism "officially" started growing into what we see today in U.S.A., need look no further than "the Patriot Act" and it's criminal abuses.  It apparently was not temporary, and was always intended to  criminally target Americans and citizens of other nations, also, in their own nations.

Obviously a variety of ramifications are associated with the issue regarding ICE being at the Olympics.  The worst of them is how ICE presence is now being used to threaten people in other nations with its presence in their nations.  Normal Americans are and should be aghast and ashamed regarding the lawlessness of the current rogue U.S. administration.  It has been violating so frequently that  Congress can not keep up with the overwhelming amount of work it creates for them, all of which is  litigious. 

Gaza

 I want to encourage the reading of an excellent Jamal K Kanj op-ed: "Why would six Israelis receive more attention than 41,000 murdered Palestinians".  While reading the op-ed it brought to mind watching Israeli people trying to debate and justify the torturing of Palestinian prisoner hostages.   Whatever other evil that brings to mind it also seemed to shout "White Messianic Superiority".   The Israelis  passionately trying to support those crime are clearly promoting abject hate.  And it also looks like they embody little or no traditional Semitic heritage and culture that has long been common to all the indigenous Palestinians, regardless of their religious belief.  

Knowing the origin of the majority of the early immigrant Jewish refugees (Russians from the Ukraine from the 1800s, onward, due to the anti-semitic pogroms), and the most recent immigrant refugees to Israel  (Ukrainians in the past few years).  The hate that motivates that debate seems to  indicate those particular folks do not embody the semitic culture of all indigenous Palestinian (of all religions and ethnicity).  Does that indicate those  imagining that torture is acceptable and debatable are either  1st generation immigrants to Israel, or the children of 1st generation of immigrants, and/or the descendants of the early quasi-religious political zionist zealots from Europe?

To be more clear, and very clear, I am not suggesting that problem exists in the indigenous native Palestinian demographic of Jews, Christians, and Muslims living in Israel and oPT, today or in the past.   However it does seems quite clear it is a problem that has thrived and grown through the generations which arrived with the immigrant refugees who already were, or shortly after were converted into zealous political zionists by the political zionist leadership when it arrived in Palestine shortly after WWI to create a "Jewish Liberation Army" in Palestine.  In fact there was nothing about the lives of the demographic of indigenous Jewish folks of Palestine from which they needed to be "liberated" divisively - politically or religiously - from the rest of the indigenous Palestinian population.  The Jewish Palestinians who did not want to cooperate with the violent "liberation" effort of the political zionist leadership were manipulatively extorted, which resulted in their cooperation.

As a result of current events, and history, reading the op-ed also causes wonderment  about how the quasi-religious zionist cult of "White Messianic Superiority" in Israeli, is  different than the quasi-religious cult of the supposedly surreptitious white supremacist "White Christian Nationalist" cult in U.S.A.?  I suggest they are near  identical, and that Israel's quasi-religious cult is as far removed from actual Judaism, as America's is far removed from actual Christianity.   If that collusion does not shout Fascism and more specifically the neo-Nazism of modern times, then I don't know what does so, more clearly..

I have come to the undeniable conclusion that the establishment of  Israel was/is a huge false flag long-term Nazi endeavor that preceded and promoted the rise of WWII Nazism; that the establishment of the political zionist state of  Israel was intended to attract as many Jewish folks to one place as possible to make it easier to victimize a huge number of them all at one time.  That was the actual intent of the anti-semitic Christian Zionists in the early 1800s who preceded and promoted secular Jewish political zionism that required 50 years to manifest.. 

All the quasi-religious efforts to use religion to justify what religion does not condone, for which  political zionism is notorious, always intended for the first victims to be the Jewish demographic.  Those folks were not religious scholars for the most part, so were able to more easily buy into the zealous pushing of the political zionist ideology by it's leadership. The same demographic, in these time is also seemingly the  the last to know the creation of the zionist state was intended to make victims of Jewish folks - all at the genocidal cost, also, of the indigenous Palestinians of every religion.  

Those leaders created and participated in the terrorist gangs in Palestine that engaged in the massacres of villagers which started the Nakba in April 1948 - the catastrohe and "exodus" of non-Jewish Palestinians from the region the political zionist terrorists wanted for a Jewish only nation.  The non-Jewish Palestinian people had been told they would be killed if they did not leave their homes and land behind that were in the territory the political zionist leadership (by then terrorist gangs) wanted.  The lightning speed massacres of people in numerous villages proved that.  A month after the largest massacre, in April, which resulted in the catastrophic leaving behind by non-Jewish Palestinians of their homes and properties imagining they would be able to return, that same political zionist terrorist leadership declared Israel to be a nation, and peopled the first government of Israel.  The descendants of some of those folks are still peopling the government in a seemingly inherited quais-royalty way. 

Clearly, the very creation of the rogue nation of Israel was based on a genocidal intention and series of actions targeting Palestinians.  Rogue nation, because the partition was intended to be peacefully negotiated - to resolution.  However, the political zionist leadership wanted the first draft in December 1947 of the partition to be the final draft.  That resulted a series of massacres in Palestinian village (though there had been a series of systematic massacres prior to that also) and the decision of the terrorist leadership to forcibly declare the territory they wanted as a Jewish only nation which they did in May 1948 - to prevent further negotiating of the partitioning of Palestine.  However, that did not entirely put an end to the efforts to negotiate - until the same terrorists (by that time the Israeli government leadership) assassinated the chief negotiator of the partition, in September 1948.

That same demographic of Jewish folks who were not religious scholars in those times, is also seemingly the same demographic these days - and the last to know the creation of the zionist state was intended to make victims of Jewish folks - all at the genocidal cost, also, of the indigenous Palestinians of every religion..  

What else could account for the Israeli leadership choices consistently between then and now, being so far removed from the values of the religion of the indigenous Jewish Palestinians, if not "white messianic superiority" of the European immigrants?  Even non-Jews know better about Judaism  than the  cult of the  Israeli government that professes and superimposes  the political zionist ideology on the Israeli people - which promotes atrocities that of course are antithetical to Judaism.  

From the start it has been the indigenous Palestinians (Muslims, Christians, Jews . . . ) who have been made to pay for all the crimes of that collusion of ideological cults that manifested and continues to be supported in Israel, predominately by the same so-called "Christian" and "Jewish" ideological political cults in the U.S.A. and Britain.  It is also at great cost to the people of U.S.A. and Britain, whose taxes are primary supporting the genocidal Israel political cult and it's genocidal citizenry. It is no mystery that the majority of Israeli adults embraces genocidal hatred of Palestinians, given there is a universal draft of 18 year olds.  They are drafted to embody and engage in abject hate, that is encouraged to genocidally target Palestinian people.  The full extent of that cost has yet to be comprehended by the majority of  citizens in U.S.A. and Britain.  Whether or not people elected and appointed to government positions are as unaware as the citizenry, or as corrupt as the political zionist collusion, likely depends on the number of people who buy into the ideology of political zionist white supremacy who are serving in our government. 

There are numerous tales of people who have been shoved out of office in our nation by the illegal Israeli lobbies (i.e. which are not registered as foreign agents) because so many are dual citizens of Israel and America, but always put Israel first when making decisions *for the American people* especially if they gave up their Israeli citizenship to be able to serve the U.S. government for the benefit of Israel.  As hard as our legislators in the Israel First camp try to convince themselves and everyone else in our nation that what is good for Israel is good for America - it simply ain't so. 

There remains a concentrated effort of the Israeli lobby to people the U.S.A. and British governments with those who are political zionist zealots, which has resulted in any means to an end efforts to replace legislators who do not want to cooperate with what Israel wants from our government.  The Israeli lobby is well-funded and throws money and perks into the political arena to get different people elected when the ones who have been elected do not want to cooperate with the Israeli lobby.  Those are the least offensive and least criminal methods employed.

Cynthia McKinney's story is a textbook case.  She refused to be silenced by the bullying and badgering of the Israeli lobby, and those who bought into that lobbies maligning of her about everything except Israel - because she would not cooperate with how the Israeli lobby wanted her to vote, in favor of Israel.  She was not the first nor the last person that happened to, but one of the more recent people who did not remain silent about the manipulative efforts, because she is among the folks who  stood up for what was best for our nation, and called out the manipulative, corruption, bribery,  extortion, and harassment  applied to persuade people in our legislatures to cooperate.  As a result the Israeli lobby put a full out effort with any means to an end in the 2002 election to support an opposing candidate who the party was also "persuaded" to support.  And of course as part of that entire debacle, the retributive political zionist Israeli lobby continued to malign Cynthia McKinney.  Even so she was elected again.  However, there was a continued concentrated effort to derail and harass her. 

Agree or disagree with her politics, views, opinions about collusion, she has never been afraid to ask the hard questions, to explore "sensitive" issues for the purpose of needed debated (in part sensitive because of the risk of ill-intent coming to light that would also implicate those who had chosen to cooperate with the ill-intended).  She knew what needed to be talked about and had the courage to state an opinion, whether or not other folks were willing to explore the issues more deeply that she brought up because they needed a closer look. When she brought up known collusions (which were not widely known) because of the need for further inquiry, there was always a concentrated effort to silence her and label her a conspiracy theorist when she was standing up for the best interests of the people of Georgia and the American people. 

Cynthia McKinney was a force of nature while she was serving in government.  She refused to be silent so that other folks could be comfortable about the status quo which needed to be questioned.  And lest it be forgotten , or perhaps never known, pertinent to present times, she was an early supporter of the international Free Gaza movement, which again resulted in active clashes with the political zionist machine, which included armed attacks by Israel on ships taking supplies to Gaza.  Israel prevaricated about the attacks. She has since earned her Ph.D. and has never stopped working for the best interests of the American people. 

Like I said above, hers is a textbook case about which there is much to be learned about both all the good she has done for our nation, and AIPACs discomfort with and targeting of Cynthia McKinney for being honest, not being silent about injustice and corruption, putting our nation first, and for not remaining silent about Israel's victimizing of Palestinians.

In U.S. the combined Christian/Jewish quais-religious political cult and collusion, of what appears to be primarily "white supremacists" exemplified by the political zionism of the Israeli government,  is totally antithetical to our Constitutional separation clause that protects religion from government and government from religion, while insuring individual freedom of worship.  That alone should raise the question of what looks like unconditional support from our nation, for Israel, at high cost to we, the people, when is in support of a nation that functions antithetically to it's claimed religious allegiance, and wants us to to violate our Constitution regarding our separation clause - is actually dedicated to that end.

I am very angry at all of the criminal conniving - in particular the corruption of our U.S.A. government's support by the political zionist state, no matter which administration, given that they have all promoted, supported, and financed it for relentless decades, while participating in the government of Israel's long-term hypocrisy, truth twisting, lying, and cheating, plus all the associated crimes of the myriad of false flag attacks (that are oh so obvious, yet elude the comprehension of so many, as intended).  Our legislative branch makes a career of ignoring those.

More recently there is absolutely NO excuse for the concentrated development of spreading the Gaza-like genocidal atrocities into the rest of oPT, also, from where most of the Palestinian prisoner hostages (including Palestinian children) originated long-ago, and have continued to originate without cause and without charges during the Gaza genocide.  Along with the ongoing genocidal actions in Gaza,  today's invasion of Jenin, still on going, is the most recent genocidal action targeting Palestinians in the rest of oPT.
 
As usual - there must be a disclaimer to fend off claims of a debate being valid about the fact that the political zionist Israeli government is targeting Palestinians with a genocide.   There is no debate.  A genocide has actually been occurring for many decades, based on the agreed upon International Law  legal definition of genocide to which Israel and most of the world's nations are signatory.  The  instances of the Israeli government's genocidal intent and actions simply have not been saturating the media through the decades.  And as many of us know they have intentionally been kept out of the media, moreso in U.S.A. than in Israel.
 
If you have not already done so, do read Jamal K Kanj insightful op-ed: "Why would six Israelis receive more attention than 41,000 murdered Palestinians".

The Unresolved Mandate of Palestine: Three Realities, Two Solutions

There are three realities created by the unresolved Mandate of Palestine, and two solutions which have been on the table for decades without either having been fully negotiated.

1. The unnegotiated Partition of the Palestinian Mandate, is the reality of the nations of the world which has yet to resolve the final boundaries of the partition.  It has been recognized as the legal  reality by the nations of the world for 75 years.  And it is known as the "The Two State Solution".  

2. The reality of the Palestinian people living in what the Israeli government has said is  "disputed territory" due to the unresolved Partition, is the brutal deadly martial law in the Apartheid Reserve/Reservation system Palestinians have lived under since 1967, for five generations, the very youngest being the start of the sixth generation.  The Palestinians living in the Apartheid Reserves are not citizens and have no rights.  It is the actuality.   And it is known as "The One State Solution".

3. There is also the reality of the Israeli people.  Their government denies both solutions, and will not negotiate either the legal reality that is the brutally deadly "Two State Solution" or the brutally deadly  dysfunctional actuality of the Apartheid "One State Solution".  And in its denial the Israeli government continues to blame and kill Palestinians with it's illegal relentless continual 75 years of betrayal through deceit and every form of fraudulent corruption it has used as an excuse to target Palestinians in their own land.  The Israeli reality is the basis of the "any means to an end" ideology of political zionism which is the foundational structure of their Israeli government.

In other words, in actuality the political zionist government of Israel has repeatedly betrayed the entire world of nations with its deceiving corruption by violating agreements, UN resolutions, the 4th Geneva Conventions, International Law, agreements to which is it signatory with conditions it has not  honored.  Of course the worst betrayal and harm has been the intentional victimizing of Palestinian refugees since 1948 (for 75 years) who have also been the target of Israel's very active brutal, deadly, illegal abuse since 1967 (for 55 of those 75 years) which is a very long list of violations.  It includes the atrocity of several genocidal attacks on Palestinian people, with the most frequent genocidal collective punishment (for being Palestinian) being indiscriminate killing of thousands of  people in Gaza.

It is a special type of betrayal the Israeli government perpetrates on the Israeli people.  Increasingly more people, worldwide, have been eventually realizing it is not possible, in good conscience, to remain silent and deny the relentless violations and crimes that have been occurring.  Increasingly more Israelis have realized the violations and crimes are a betrayal to Judaism, themselves, Palestinians, and the nations of the world, many of whom have trusted and loved the idea of the myth of Israel without having questioned the obvious contradictions, or relentless betrayals by the Israeli government.

The  people most overwhelmed by the 75 years of betrayal by the government of Israel when the actuality of it penetrates their consciousness, are those who have been accommodating it the longest until they finally start questioning what has been happening. Then they realize they have either been supporting it out of an  unconditional loyalty and  trust, or in ignorance, based in both cases on Israel's misleading hasbara which its staunchest political zionist cheerleaders outside of Israel also perpetrate.  When those who start doing their own research to prove people wrong who they want to believe are unjustly criticizing the government of Israel, then they increasingly feel betrayed as they  find that the context which was provided by people who they wanted to believe, was wrong and the actual facts having nothing to do with anti-semitism. 

Bogusly claiming anti-semitism, has long been the government of Israel's go-to response to all who speak up with bona fide facts about the fraudulent betrayals of the Israeli government - without a word of blame directed at Judaism or Jewish people.   Neither all Jews nor Judaism can not be blamed for the atrocities of the Israeli government.  The government of Israel has also made a bad habit of abusively targeting people everywhere in the world  in any way possible who refuse to be silent about the government of Israel's intended ongoing victimizing of Palestinian refugees in their own land.

Seventy five years  is too long for the world of nations to accommodate an overwhelming burden of denied betrayal by the government of Israel that not only has been directed at Palestinian refugees in their own land, but also anyone who speaks of the government of Israel’s long-term ongoing brutal betrayal to Palestinians in their own land.  It is also a betrayal to Israelis, and all the people of the world who at one time loved the idea and myth of a modern day Israel for what they believed it was, and had the potential to be without doing harm to anyone.

The Problem with A.I.? It's DOA!

Reading an article today about a new version of ChatGPT, its creaters were saying it is "hallucinating"?  Hmm . . . well now exactly what does that say about its creators?  Perhaps more than they know. 

ChatGPT, GPT-4, and A.I. in general, are starting out "crazy" with A.I.  perpetuating source monitoring errors by getting confused about what is actual - real or unreal - along with being  ontologically confused about what is metaphorical or factual?  Clearly it is unavoidably mirroring its programmers.     

Perhaps the temporal problem of time-shifting that seems to be associated with time reflection echoing created A.I. "hallucinations"?

"Time reflection is a uniform inversion of the temporal evolution of a signal, which arises when an abrupt change in the properties of the host material occurs uniformly in space. At such a time interface, a portion of the input signal is time reversed, and its frequency spectrum is homogeneously translated as its momentum is conserved, forming the temporal counterpart of a spatial interface. Combinations of time interfaces, forming time metamaterials and Floquet matter, exploit the interference of multiple time reflections for extreme wave manipulation, leveraging time as an additional degree of freedom."¹

For a while it has already been more difficult than normal to do meaningful specific searches on Google about topics that are not trending, not  popular, not of interest to all.  Coincidence or A.I. limits?

 A.I. is pre-programmed machine language based on what is essentially peer pressure interests i.e. what is trending in the online and programming world.  A.I. seems little more than  limited programmed automation on high speed computers, thus an inconvenience with information searches that make us all part of the experimental phase.  Compared to thought processes there is an obvious difference between interacting with reality, and interacting with quantum automation which is like a limiting lifeless ceiling that does not resonate with actual self-aware consciousness.

I do not like the  lifeless lack of energy in A.I. processing which is far different than actual conscious "thinking", even that which is not heavily laden with emotions but at least is associated with the life force.  There is no synchronicity without life force - instead only quantum speed programmed calculating.

A practical application anticipated by stock brokers, it seems, is a better outcome as they envision A.I. being used to guide clients and bankers.  Reading between the lines that seems about plotting the trends with quantum speed to be able ride the wave and stay on top of when to buy and sell for the most profit.  How can advertising not  become more phrenetic as a result?

---

1 Moussa, H., Xu, G., Yin, S. et al. Observation of temporal reflection and broadband frequency translation at photonic time interfaces. Nat. Phys. (2023). online: Nature, 13 March 2023 (accessed: 14 March 2023) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-023-01975-y

^↩

Disinformation Governance Board: Transparency vs Political Nepotism?

How can we not consider the problem of transparency at all levels of government to not be based on political nepotism?  Numerous instances illustrate it is - especially at the more local levels where all oversight, if any is claimed to exist, often is determined by a network of family nepotism that expands to become political nepotism.  Does the Department of Homeland Security's new misinformation board, verify the political corruption that has long been in play, has now institutionalized corrupt political nepotism?  It would behoove us to concern ourselves with the possibility.  This article: "DHS secretary says disinformation board won’t infringe on free speech: We’re not opinion police" expresses concern about free speech.  Perhaps it is more pressing to be concerned about the board institutionalizing an increased lack of government transparency.

Will the Disinformation Governance Board infringe on free speech?  I don't know. I agree that propaganda disinformation is used to create conflict, that it originates with a self-declared enemy we must consider to at least be a threat in specific ways.  However, it has been proven many times over that we can learn facts about our own government from outside sources when transparency is lacking in our own media. I am not referring to the myriad of Russian propaganda internet sites that have become so prolific online in the past years.  I am referring primarily to facts that we can sometimes verify as accurate when people file Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests about information from sources outside our nation - and/or Pulitzer worthy investigative journalism.  It seems that a practical concern is more about the possibility of government efforts to institute less transparency rather than curtail our personal freedom of speech.
 
This does no mean freedom of speech is not always under attack in some way or another.  However, it is difficult to understand why disinformation is considered a freedom of speech issue when it is a libel and/or slander legal problem.  Banning what people and processes of a misinformation board might consider to be damaging misleading disinformation harmful to supposed public naiveté, likely could interfere with prosecuting those who originate disinformation for their libel and/or slander.  When we consider any information to be  propaganda we don't look further but instead make a choice to believe or not believe what could be ill-intended libel and/or slander that needs to be prosecuted at any level - from personal to international.

Of course the board is concerned with disinformation about our government.  But overreach into interfering with exercising our freedoms is easy especially when there is a lack of transparency about such a board. What is perplexing is that misinformation is not being responded to with prosecution for libel and/or slander - or at least not denied when government at any level is the target.  Instead it is ignored by government.  Yet, we see social sites cracking the whip with one-sided "fact checking" designed to set us straight by telling what to think, about what is or is not accurate.  It is  probably at their advertisers' bidding, and to some extent government's too - when government threatens to lower the boom based on the small print in the ways applicable regulations are interpreted.  Also, our media offers too much useless "news" coverage that instead focuses on anything about which conflict can be encouraged, since conflict seems to be what is assumed will draw the interest of viewers and readers.  But libel and slander are legal issues and when prosecuted are usually not broadcast about, during the process.  So the focus of news programs and publications on what is often deemed to be disinformation, suggests prosecuting for libel and/or slander is not occurring.  What does that suggest to us about supposed disinformation? 

Those who investigate through FOIA what may or may not be misinformation, in the event that actual sources are provided, sometimes are able to verify whether or not the information is factual.  However, we also need to keep in mind that our news has been controlled for a very long time.  This does not refer to what is broadcast obsessively instead of news, which may be more driven by corporate advertising than by government.  In this case the concern about control is what government does not want on the news.  Corporate advertisers have likely been government's hand-maidens in that way by driving what news reports obsess about to redirect interest as a way to avoid reporting actual news.  A misinformation governance board seems destined, on the surface at least, to be direct manipulation of news from government - social media fact checking style  on a larger scale.  In effect that would be little different than the way dictatorships control what is not allowed to be broadcast and published. 

Considering the problem of a lack of transparency because of political nepotism, is advisable.  There are many instances indicating exactly that. Many of us recall coming to this abrupt realization about controlled news when news of Viet-Nam was not being broadcast honestly because of a lack of transparency.  The American public needed to know because we were and continue to be a collectively self-governing citizenry whose responsibility is to educate ourselves enough about issues to be able to do our jobs of advising those who are elected and appointed government officials.  I also want to mention one particular personal experience that illustrates transparency based on political nepotism which I encountered within the past decade when asking about "real id".

The only information available about real id is what is needed to apply for it.  Try asking exactly what information is conveyed via "real id" and see what happens.  Stonewalled.  Try telling the "powers that be" you need to verify the accuracy of the information being conveyed via real id,- and see what happens!  Again - stonewalled.  As individual we should never be prevented from the right to verify and/or correct information used by real id to profile us - which, denied, becomes unacceptable overreach on an individual basis that is an unacceptable lack of government transparency.  Credit Bureaus exemplify the serious problems that can occur because of financial profiling errors.  Any collection of data about us, to profile us financially or any other way, needs to be freely subject to our perusal so we are able to correct what is not accurate. Try telling that to information dealers online, used for background checking. Stonewalled.  No doubt not only info gathered from online social sites, but also official records about us actually need to actually be fact-checked by us for errors!

I asked about real id years ago via e-mail - about the information that is provided through real id, and how we can access it to be sure it is accurate.  A response was not forthcoming. Is it only coincidental that unwarranted, harassment has increased exponentially since that time in my own life - prior to covid since there is more occurring because of covid?  I finally requested a birth certificate last year to use for my real id drivers license, and received a notarized piece of paper with a few facts.  Then covid happened so I still have not applied for my real id drivers license.  I had a problem with the limits of what was sent, and the only way possible to acquire it.  When I had requested a copy of my birth certificate in summer 1970, I was sent a faxed copy of my birth record - which is exactly what I needed. Was that considered to be a "birth certificate" at the time, or was the notarized copy in use today considered the birth certificate then too?  Of course that is also considered a pesky question to ask people who should know the answer.  Uh huh - stonewalled.

Of course the photosensitive paper used in fax machines in the early 70s eventually became a blank sheet of worthless photosensitive fax paper. Once again I need a copy of my birth record which is what I expected the birth certificate to be. One need not be a genius to realize that a notarized stable copy of the actual birth record is far more trustworthy for real id than a notarized copy that extracts a few facts.  I found nowhere online to ask for my birth record which I still need.  What comes up in a search is ONLY the option to pay a company to serve as a middle man to request and sends the birth certificate, which I reluctantly did having no other choice.  No search produces anything other than middle-man services which says states use that service for birth certificate requests. Looking at state websites, only the costly middle-man service is used for birth certificate requests.  I have enjoyed doing genealogy research for decades and know it has been possible to request birth records.  I still need my own birth record - the same document genealogists request and are sent. As verification for real id - I repeat - a notarized stable copy of the actual birth record as a birth certificate, is far more trustworthy for real id than a notarized copy that extracts a few facts.

The point being?  Without transparency about who is serving on the board, how the board is selected, and the processes that govern what the board actually does and how. we would do well to be concerned about what otherwise seems to be further institutionalization of  corrupt political nepotism that has already been increasingly limiting transparency in government - possibly as long as governments have existed.  No doubt the extent of corrupt political nepotism has always vacillated - dependent on the governed and the use of the freedoms with which they are empowered to maintain their freedoms.  Knowing all that does not insure the misinformation governance board is not already rife with the problems of political nepotism.  The extent of resistance to transparency about requests for details and clarity - needed information about the disinformation board, will suggest in what ways we need to productively direct our concern.

Acceptable Candidates and Supportable Party Platforms

Biden’s approval rating hits its lowest with 33 per cent in new poll by Eric Garcia in UK's Independent.

Although the message I take away from this article is likely not the primary message most people will take away from it, the message being conveyed which I consider to be most important, is that we need to do a much better job of offering up qualified acceptable candidates and party platform policy recommendations so that we are not electing people through the process of voting against "the lesser of the evils".

I wish numerous people would write articles that actually state this clearly and plainly, to hammer home a message it is vital for all to understand. Not everyone is willing to become an expat for however long it may be necessary, otherwise, when they do not consider either candidate to be acceptable.  And of course not everyone can afford the luxury of choosing to be an expat for an extended time.

Many consider the lack of acceptable candidates, and supportable party platforms, to be due to a lack of participation.  However,the lack of participation problem at the grassroots level is not necessarily reflective of what people want to do, or prefer to do.  I have made a successful effort to participate in other places I have lived.  That is not how it is where I currently live.  If inquiries about attending a local meeting do generate a response, they are met only with a response  about "pay to play" meetings and cost requirements for party membership.  What!?  I was astounded to be presented with "pay to play".  I honestly thought it was illegal.

It has never been mandatory, elsewhere, to pay dues to be a party member before being participating in discussions at local caucus meetings.  I do wonder how widespread the problem is, nationwide.  Not only can I not afford the "required" cost, more importantly, in principle, I am unwilling to pay a required cost to participate!  Of course a pay to play response discourages many people - and is obviously intended to do so.  It is no wonder people increasingly truly believe that elections and election processes are being bought.

Note that I use the term "caucus" to indicate local meetings, although other folks may use other terms.  I use "caucus" according to the inclusive definition (rather than the limited exclusive definition), that being: "any political group or meeting organized to further a special interest or cause"

Participating in local caucus meetings where platform policies and potential candidates are discussed and eventually agreed upon, should be freely open to everyone who selects a party when registering to vote, and wants to attend local meetings.  In other places I have lived caucus meetings are organized at the local community level, like the the radius of a neighborhood of many blocks.  The grassroots participation I refer to here, is not city, sector, county, or state wide - but on a much smaller neighborhood scale .  Each of the smaller local meetings then sends representative to the less frequent next larger consolidated meeting -  be it sector, city, county, or state wide.  And no one registered for  the party of the meeting they wish to attend and participate in, is prevented from attending those either - even though each local area selects representatives to speak for the group.

Local neighborhood caucus meetings really are the way for grassroots participation to be as diverse and as representative in all ways as the local areas in which folks live.  As such it is a way to develop a more acceptable slate of candidates and policy recommendations.  That is why "pay to play", in every form, should be illegal.  

Allow me to once more emphasize that in too many elections, too many people have no other choice than to vote against candidates instead of for candidates.  And this is simply an unacceptable situation. 

Ultimately, taken to the extreme, when there are no acceptable choices - and this holds true universally, not only with political candidates and party platforms - then no matter the situation it precipitates insurmountable problems.  Worse, when there are repeatedly no acceptable choices and instead only damaging choices - then depending on the scale of the collusion that limits choices to all being unacceptable (and it will always be a collusion limiting choices in that way), the repetitive problem of unacceptable choices eventually leads to conflict, armed combat - the atrocities of war.

Loopholes in Our Laws That Do Not Prevent Torture

We are not responsible citizens as long as we allow loopholes in the imprecise ways some of our laws are written, so they do not actually support the spirit of the protection we want to believe has been enacted by laws that are being enforced.

Our nation has to stop doing, through creating loophole laws, what we collectively want to believe has been made illegal for our nation - for good reasons.  In this case, a problem that has recently been reported is one of many schemes throughout the years that has found our nation, once again, to be financing what we believe is illegal and being enforced - like extraditing people to other nations to torture them with our own people participating in the torture, or managing those who do the torturing; like financing animal experiments in other nations that torture animals.  We need to make the financing and participation in torture of people and animals, anywhere, illegal for citizens and permanent residents of our nation - and of course within our nation also for people who are not here legally, since the extent of that problem continues to loom large and laws apply to all living in our nation.

Clearly, our laws do not cover all the bases.  Unfortunately, what they do is create loopholes that, as too many laws are intended to do in some way or another, allow ways to violate because of not being precisely articulated to prevent the abuse.  Of course the result fools our own people as our nation slides further into the abyss of double-standard hypocrisy because of loophole laws designed to hide the hypocrisy of violations.  People in other nations are not fooled as easily.  They increasingly connect our nation to becoming more and more hypocritical and untrustworthy in contradiction to our nation's stated values, principles, ideals, because they experience our hypocrisy in their own nations to which so many of us seem oblivious.  We continue to believe are laws do what we assume they do, and are being adequately enforced.  People in other nations are often aghast that we allow this to happen when we are collectively empowered to self-govern - that is to actively participate in advising those who are elected and appointed to do what we need them to do for the benefit of our nation and other people also.  Truth be told our only effective laws are win-win, not win-lose at the expense of some in our nation or other nations.

Decent law abiding people in our own nation, do not expect loopholes to be built into our laws - in this case laws that make torturing people and animals illegal.  People do not expect imprecise laws to allow our nation to be financing the torture of people it chooses to torture, or to finance the torturing of animals in nations where those violations are not illegal.  People do not expect loopholes in the laws that allow us to pay people of other nations to torture people and animals we ask them to, on our behalf; nor do we expect our own people to be used - contractors and/or military folks - to engage in torture in other nations where torture is legal; nor where it may be illegal, but is overlooked and allowed - for profit that is extended by our nation, or any organization our nation is part of that fiances and participates in the violating abuse of torture.

We can not allow what has become the stress of well orchestrated and well timed perpetual crises, one after the other, to be obstacles that redirect us in ways that  prevent us from doing what must be done.  Laws must be revised so they are not misleading because of  built-in loopholes that do not precisely prevent abuse of the laws we believe exist - which we also want to assume are being enforced.  In this case the laws sound good but apparently do not precisely cover the ways in which people intent on refusing to say "no" to the evil of torture, are allowed to abuse the spirit of the law. 

The reality of the problem is more horrifying for folks who have recently recognized the loophole problem.  However, it is nothing new under the sun in humanities history so why is it a problem and how can it be prevented?  More precisely, how can we prevent it, because it is our collective responsibility to speak up about imprecise laws that allow violations by our nation we can not imagine - can not believe are occurring - until we know otherwise. 

Imprecisely written laws are so common it is near to impossible for some of us to believe that loopholes in laws are unintended by the people representing our wishes who write the laws on our behalves.  Enough of these folks are highly educated and skilled enough in the law and in being articulate, to avoid making space for the built-in loopholes we find in a myriad of laws that allow them to be violated in ways that do not more  precisely outlaw the violations it is in the spirit of we, the people, to want to prevent.

Sources
A few sources which suggest there is little or no effort to outlaw torture.  Although it all sounds civil enough and is better than nothing, there appears to be little or no effort to outlaw U.S.A. from financing, supporting, and/or causing the torture of people and animals in other nations.  After at least 9000 years of history recorded in writing which is accessible, "civil enough" and "better than nothing" is not enough and has not been for a very long time:

1.  We can not be assured of Wikipedia accuracy but the article provides a big picture view:
Wikipedia article:  Animal rights by country or territory

2.  Recent information from the animal protection group White Coat Waste Project:
White Coat Waste Blog 3 March 2022: Breaking: WCW Discovers NIH Pays For Cruel Kitten Experiments…In Russia!

3.  Also investigations from White Coat Waste Project from July 2012:
"The top recipients of NIH funds in 2020 were institutions in wealthy countries, with German and Canadian institutes receiving the most taxpayer dollars sent abroad for animal testing that year. Other major grant recipients included entities in Australia, the Netherlands, Switzerland, South Africa, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Taiwan and Ghana."
Newsweek article:  Zebrafish on Ecstasy and Feeding Mice Human Feces: NIH Hikes Funding for Animal Testing

4. Clearly this bill does not go far enough to stop torturing of animals which it is not intended to do.  It seems primarily intended to manage who does not make decisions and in which nations torturous research can not be carried out that is financed by our nation:
117th Congress (2021-2022) text of H.R.5527: Accountability in Foreign Animal Research Act
"To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Director of the National Institutes of Health from conducting or supporting research on animals in certain foreign countries, and for other purposes."

5.  Three links about extradition which only seem to dance around the issue of torture without intention to outlaw it:

Carmichael Ellis & Brock law firm provides a brief synopsis of extradition, to and from our nation, including U.S. Citizens, none of which seems intent on preventing torture by U.S.A. of anyone, anywhere to include U.S.A. citizens:
Extradition from the US

ACLU from 2008:
Documents Reveal U.S. Knowingly Transfers Detainees To Countries That Torture

From CSR Reports, as much detail as anyone might want within the time frame of September 30, 2003 – October 4, 2016:
Extradition To and From the United States: Overview of the Law and Contemporary Treaties (downloadable)

6. Department of Justice website which may be the current Law and Treaties - but is not stated as such.  Reading the entirety of the 9-15.000, provisions may or may not specifically address an intention to outlaw torture:
9-15.000 - International Extradition And Related Matters

Thoughts About "Scale Invariant Unification"

The term "Scale Invariant Unification" very clearly refers to a very complex topic, even though it is an easy concept to understand.  Although it has been in the realm of a philosophic concept for a very long time, transformation into the the reality of words and math that reflect it, is a complex process the application requiring peer review and adjustment on the part of the entire scientific community.

Here is a link to an abstract for the Nassim Haramein, Olivier Alirol "Scale Invariant Unification"  paper - more precisely entitled "Scale Invariant Unification of Forces, Fields & Particles in a Quantum Vacuum Plasma" which reads as something more complex to understand.  However, basically we can under stand it more simply as meaning the work addresses relationships between and among variables that apply in the same ways at all scales from the smallest to the largest.  Because of consistency at all scales, of course we know that the largest consists of the smallest in fractal, scalar, and holistic ways and so informs us about processes that may not be observable, when investigated, at the smallest scales - or the largest, or some place in between.  A theoretical understanding is that as long as we are able to  understand predictable basic well-defined relational processes among the variables of a  process at some observable scale, then we can understand them as predictable processes at all scales.

The abstract about the paper under peer review, soon to be published, is a short understandable read.  And whether or not one fully understands the physics, the abstract conveys the epic nature of the issue being addressed to both scientists and non-scientists.  The published paper will include the mathematical proofs which will result in calculations of increased accuracy.  And it may do away with the need for at least some of the named but undefined unknown variables currently being used as placeholders to "normalize" equations - which is nothing more than assigning a name to what we can not account for or identify that is missing in our understanding (and the mathematical equation!) but appears to have some amount of observable influence on processes because of relationships among the many variables of a process, suggesting variables which we may not have identified correctly in relationship to one another.

Scale Invariant Processes
Because of the concept of scale invariant unification we can understand the processes we observe on a large scale in the universe, as the same processes that are not measurable at the quantum scale of sub sub sub atomic particles, and  those unknown and undefinable at any scale.  For example consider stars of many varieties popping into and out of existence.  Because of their large scale and volume, even at a distance our current technology can reveal to us some of the processes during their various stages of energetic transformation, based on variables like mass, composition, pressure, temperature, spin, fluid dynamics which are demonstrably true of the relational behavior of energy and matter at any scale.

For example closest to us we observe the Sun, our own white dwarf star, which provides observable information about the processes of energy/matter transformations, on larger and smaller scales.  For that reason the measurable observable variable relationships evident in our sun, can be applied to energy transformations we observe at huge distances in a variety of stars, where only part of the processes we are able to  measure in our own star, are observable in the distant stars.  For example energy transformations include shock waves (acoustic waves/gravitational waves) that radiate with force in all directions from an event at any scale of size.  Those waves carry and spew elements and sub atomic particles into "the vacuum" of space which are referred to as "dust" and forcefully interact with energy fluctuations in the vacuum, creating stable matter  in regions of space, like elements of a variety of sizes, including large scale molecular combinations of elements, the combinations being dependent on the limiting amount of elements and the magnitude of the processes that created those waves.

We know that an accumulation of visible dust in a region of space can coalesce into a cloud, the area of which we can describe with volumetric coordinates.  We know that within those clouds of "dust", stars and solar systems are in the process of being born. We know about a variety of transformations of different types of stars.  We know about the types of elements and particles they spew out, and the types of stars they transform into.  We know that no one lives long enough to observe any one star from the time it "pops" into existence until it "pops" out of existence.  However we can observe and understand on a much smaller scale, many of the processes we know of, like in our sun, which provides information we need to better understand long-term large processes at huge distances from our point of observation of them.  Similarly, it also informs us of information we need to understand the immeasurable smaller processes also at huge distances from us in their smaller sizes from our point of observation.  If is seems a somewhat fractal concept that is because a holographic universe is somewhat fractal, and holistic in nature.

The same processes that occur at all scales with different combinations of sub sub sub atomic particles, combining into stable and unstable particles and elements, are relationally the same processes that result in energy popping into and out of particles and energy of any volume whether they do not last long enough to measure at the Quantum scale of unmeasurable visibility and speed, or are visible galactic processes that are detectable in some ways though immeasurable in length of time.  However, they are the same repetitive relational processes of energy to matter, matter to energy, associated with combining of particles, creation of stable particles, and accumulation of stable particles within regions of high energy, heat and pressure (like a cloud of dust on a large scale from the transformation of a star). That we can observe the processes in the field that is the vacuum, at a universal scale where visible matter and volume is large and processes of an entire system seem slow moving, informs us of the processes that occur at the quantum scale, so small and fast they are unobservable.  So too scale invariant unification is about observable and/or measurable small scale processes that provide insight into processes at the universal scale so large and slow they are unobservable.  But it is only the entire process that is slow relative to the quantum scale, because all processes of all objects consist of an accumulation of highly energetic quantum scale very small, very fast highly energetic building blocks.

The universal scale of entirely quantum scale energetic processes and accumulated particles. at any volume of size and mass, can be envisioned as a fractal linear connection between the quantum scale and the universal scale.  Consider observable measurable scales between the two theoretically smallest and largest scales.  We see that everything larger consists of the same quantum processes and and combinations in larger quantities of the same building blocks.  Consider the proton, a combination of sub atomic particles that is universally stable matter.  The larger an object the more protons are coalesced in a larger variety of ways into matter, as the scale of what we observe increases in size, and distance between any two points of different scales we compare.  For example consider that all the components and combinations of processes of a proton in one's own body are present in all the protons that are part of our earth, and of all the protons in the nearest solar system to us in our own galaxy, and of all the protons in the universe, actually.

Consider a process like observable movement in the frequency of an oscillation.  We define and understand an oscillation in relationship to time (and other variables).  And we understand time in relationship to the movement that is the frequency  of an oscillation (and other variables associated with that movement).  We see the process mirrored at any other scale as well, where some part of the process is observable at any other scale - large, small, and  in between.  The relationship of the variables involved is an understood process, also true at undefined and unobserved scales of any size.  Because of the relationship ratios as constants that we do understand, the processes we can not observe from our point of observation, as relatively too small and too fast, or relatively too large and too slow moving, are the same relationship processes involved when we may be able to observe or measure only one of the variables of a process.  Since we know the relationships of variables involved in processes, regardless of the scale at which the process occurs, we only need to know the value of one of them on large or small unobservable scales to inform us of how to determine the others as described by scale invariant unification relationships.

Oscillation a Time Problem and Energetic Space
An application for example?  How about a recent article: "Physicists Say This Is The Smallest Unit of Time That Could Exist" by Zeeshan Ali, 12 February 2022.

We might not have observed and defined the theoretical "smallest unit of time" however the relational ratio of variables by which that unit of time can be understood is definable and does not require a measure.

The relationships of variables that define the smallest unit of time when true at observable scales, large, small, and in between, of course hold true at undefined and unobserved scales of any size also.  So in this case the process of oscillation, in relationship to time, does not require us to define or observe/measure the limit of time the paper suggests.  Scale invariant unification does not necessarily superimpose a limit on the frequency of oscillations defined in terms of time, simply because we may want to think in terms of volumetric limits of movement when we imagine smallest and largest movements.

It would be more accurate for the title of the article to say "measurable time" or "observable time" instead of only "time", given that the article says although "Live Science reports that our technology isn’t yet nearly sensitive enough to find out for sure — a team of physicists from Penn State has now theorized the absolute maximum amount of time that a universal oscillation could take."  So it really is not about the smallest unit of measurable or observable movement in terms of time, but instead an immeasurable range with a theoretical possible maximum associated with the amount of distance of movement a smallest frequency oscillation covers.  That, in turn, tells us the smallest measure of time it requires for the oscillation to cover that distance.  Notice that time is only a relationship between movement and distance of movement.  Without movement there is no distance, and thus no measure of time.  The fluctuations of the smallest oscillating waves of energy/mass mass/energy transformations are movement, of course.

Time does not exist at equilibrium where there is absolutely no movement and as a result absolutely no dimension of change in distance.  We can understand theoretical equilibrium to be eternal/infinite.  Eternal and infinite describe timeless equilibrium.  The concept of endless distance is included, and the concept of limitless unbounded space is included.  However, at equilibrium without movement there is no time, since time is only a descriptor of measure that can be used when there is change in position between two coordinates in space, which we define as distance   When there is no time because there is no movement, and no change in distance, we have boundless timeless space without end at equilibrium that is infinite and eternal - though it may only last as long as a measure that could be faster than the speed of light.  That is a discussion for another time! 

The field of vacuum fluctuations (i.e. "space" once known by the misnomer of "empty space") is hugely energetic because of oscillations that are occurring from energy/mass transformations where sub sub sub unstable particles fleetingly pop into and out of existence.  They may not be measurable except for the disruptions we identify as fluctuations throughout space within immeasurably small volumes of space we understand theoretically.  We can envision Planck space and time as a  "boundary" where particles are not observable but the energy of them having popped into existence and popped back out of existence is noted as fluctuations that are the wave movements (oscillations) from that process in the small amount of volume in which the unstable particles and energy exist.  The vacuum of space is full of these  energetic fluctuations, as oscillations/waves from the spinning energy briefly merging into unstable particles and popping back into energy when the merging doe not create a stable particle.  And of course stability is relative, ordinarily in comparison to the other similar processes in a specified area that is being observed.

Understand that the concept of stability and size is based on how long particles exist before they totally transform into energy.  The more coalescing of sub, sub, sub atomic particles in a volume of cohesive energetic activity associated with particle activity, the more stable and long lasting that potential energy is, in the form of those particles.  For example a volume of space with stable matter could be any size from our Planck size measure to galactic family size.  It seems common sense that large combinations of particles will remain as stable matter for longer amounts of time.

We know from observing particles (like at CERN), that particles collide and create different more complex particles based on the pressure and velocity of whatever energetic processes created the accompanying "waves" (i.e. shock waves/acoustic waves/gravitational waves) that radiate.  That also happens in space (be it a large volume or a small volume of space) as a result of the forces radiating from the processes of larger stable mass going through energetic transformations - transformations like neutron stars forming, black holes merging, a molecule of water becoming two atoms of oxygen and four atoms of hydrogen.  The forces from events of huge objects create stable elements and matter of varying sizes.  The energy produced results in shock waves (e.g. acoustic waves/gravitational waves) traveling in rippling waves through large regions of space in all directions, and that creates large sized "dust" in space, as they travel through already existent regions of dust in space.  The dust is stable matter, relative to the building block particles.  We can think of that dust as the elements on the periodic table which are literally created from energetic processes of stars.  And sometimes the dust is planetary size, depending on the force of the waves and the composition of the regions of space they move through.  All elements have some measurable amount of stability compared to the particles that are their building blocks.

The dust clouds are what we recognize at a distance as "star nurseries", which are actually solar system and galaxy nurseries as well.  What is being created  depends on the events that created the composition of the dust clouds - for example, among other variables, like the limiting ratios of elements present, temperature, pressure, and the energetic processes in the mix of all particles and matter of all sizes in the observable region.

There is a link in the oscillation article, above ("Physicists Say This Is The Smallest Unit of Time That Could Exist"), to the abstract of the 2020 research cited in the article, which is the published research entitled: "Physical Implications of a Fundamental Period of Time".  It starts: "If time is described by a fundamental process rather than a coordinate, it interacts with any physical system that evolves in time". 

First let me say that I thought the published research was well-written.  However I have a problem with the first sentence in the abstract, actually, which is an example of cognitive dissonance about how "time" is understood and described, in general, not only in this article.  To add more clarity and precision, "time interacts"?  No.  Yes, to time as a way to describe energetic movement (of energy and/or mass) of fundamental process, for example motion of any volume of energy or mass - think spin, or movement from one locational coordinate to another in a theoretical grid used for purposes of measure. That process is movement, and time is how we understand and discuss the process of movement.  In actuality the movement of anything from point A to point B, relates time to distance of the movement, including the one blip of an oscillation frequency which is the subject of the article about the theoretical smallest measure of time.

Force, velocity, and other variables are part of our understanding of the fundamental processes of movement of matter and energy.  However it is not about time "interacting" with a physical system, because time does not interact.  It has no substance.  It is not energy, it is not mass, it is not  a measure of volume, or pressure  Time and distance are related because of movement.  Time and movement are related to distance of movement. where time is used to describe movement (e.g. velocity, rate of speed) from one coordinate to another.  Time is only a descriptor - only a descriptor.  The point being, unless it is known there is movement, at least between point A and point be, there is no time, since time is only used to describe and discuss amounts and types of movement, or if one prefers change in location of anything, which of course is movement.

I can agree that time is foundational to understanding and describing all fundamental processes in the universe, although time can not "interact" with anything, but instead is used as a relational  measure that describes movement of all types of variables associated with fundamental processes of mass energy/energy mass transformations.  Consider the astounding numbers of those always occurring in our bodies   From our point of observation and personal experience of the soul inhabiting the body as its temple, we intrinsically know the body, as a whole, consists of the same basic building blocks as all matter, and that high power energy transformation from matter to energy and energy to matter, pop into and out of both throughout the body at varying rates of speed associated with a multitude of simultaneous varying processes.  But our immediate sense of time is associated with the relationship of earth, moon, and sun, and is diurnal  Astrologically, time is understandable on a larger scale according to the relationships of movement among the objects in our solar system.  Our understanding of time based on motion on a larger scale becomes astronomy, astrophysics, and cosmology.

Common Sense
Because of reality as I seem to have always experienced and known it, scale invariant unification is a term that describes a "common sense" understanding.  New information that best describes actuality for anyone is experienced in that way - as common sense.   However, the actual describing of that common sense concept about scale invariant unification, in words, and with supportive mathematics describing relationships among variables, is a big deal - epic from my point of view. 

Haramein's "Scale Invariant Unification" publication and his previous publications describe reality honestly in common sense words that anyone can understand, and with common sense mathematical relationships that have not been been complicated by place holding normalizing.  Scale invariant unification is mathematical common sense, as well.  In the published paper will be substantiating mathematical proofs of concepts which are needed for reproducibility by others in the field to scrutinously work at rigorously disproving by applying the scientific method of questioning and testing and revising as much as necessary for accuracy and clarity to test their own results.  People have already been applying Haramein's contributions for over a decade and have drawn the same conclusions he has with a myriad of their own substantiating experiments. The scale invariant unification paper draws his decades of work altogether in a creative honest approach to the substantial work he has contributed that reflects a more common sense, and yes simply elegant, understanding of reality.

Haramein often speaks of the incomplete work of scientists in the field who inspired him to follow up on the clues and cues they left for those who would come later.  He and Alirol have creatively and holistically applied modern research capabilities and technology, starting at the boundaries where earlier scientists could take their research no further,  experimentally.  They have investigated those stopping points which eventually lead to understanding how to move forward from where others left off, to present a larger picture of more precise understanding - which has turned into scalar invariant unification. That is non-trivial!

Unified Physics or GUT or TOE or Reality - It's All the Same

A video with comments from a self-described non-science perspective that dovetails Nassim Haramein's work in unified physics with religious and philosophical explanations and descriptions, that have been evident in words and geometric representations throughout history. 

Unified/Unity Physics, as in  the Theory of Everything (TOE), or Grand Unified Theory (GUT), long a pursuit of physicists, is where  mathematical formulas which are relationships among variables, defined by mathematical equations/algorithms, apply equally at every size  - the entire range between smallest scale and largest scale.  

Of course smallest (quantum) and largest (universe) remain infinite/eternal/"undefined" which tends to be the limit of being a soul in a physical body; also it is where the mystery of origin/cause/creator/God(s) exists for individuals and religions in terms that can not be and do not need to be described. 

Haramein's recent on-going work is spoken of which is about precise relationships of variables used in mathematical formulas, that have a  margin of error to 13 decimal places which is far more accurate than earlier relational formulas.  It has a foundation in his process of redefining and recalculating the radius of a proton from many years ago, the more precise measure having been independently verified many times over,  the the new measure having been applied and accepted, without ado. (Yes, <smile> "ado" is considered to be a somewhat archaic word, but there is no more suitable word to convey the precise meaning.)

The work of more precise calculations and relationships between and among variables, adds a whole new level of accuracy to mathematical formulas which suggests "normalizing" is no longer required (some think it never was acceptable!) to account for magnitude of error that is a result of less precise accuracy.  These variable relationships are used in all sciences, thus bring more precision to all sciences.  They are increasing being applied for more accurate results.  

Haramein's work is the "big deal" the video conveys it is believed to be.  With peer review and reproducible work other scientists are doing which also makes it their own  work too, it brings more precision as the changes it precipitates become more common place. Sometimes decades pass before acknowledgement of credit where credit is due - sometimes, not.

 

 

Here are representative, though not exhaustive examples of the magnitude of the number of formulas and the variable relationships they describe, to which more increased precision applies across the entire spectrum of science:
Formulae Sheet for Physics from concepts-of-physics.com
 

Raising Children Without Messing Them Up

Emotionally healthy families are the stable building blocks of all that is important as a good start in life.  The video of this interview of Dr. Traci Baxley by Lewis Howes is about creating and sustaining emotionally healthy families as well as we are able.  Not everyone has had the luxury of being raised in, or creating an emotionally healthy family.  That does not mean it is too late to choose a more effective direction, whether one is long past being a child, or long past raising children to adulthood.  Because how one chooses to self-parent at all stages of life, also, is always a key that can unlock all that is good about life for other people and oneself.  

Do not miss this video if it is possible to make time to start watching.  In fact instead of reading through this, it would be advisable to start watching the video, instead.  I can not recommend it highly enough - the entire one hour, 24 minutes and 16 seconds of it.  It is a gift that offers layers and layers of experience, wisdom and excellent guidance about functional loving family relationships which many will recognize as ways they have raised or are raising their children.

Dr. Traci Baxley does a lovely job of communicating her wisdom and experience to provide guidance and respectable encouragement about family relationships.  Lewis Howes is a respectful skilled interviewer.  The interview conveys wisdom many parents will appreciate for the way it is shared, especially when they too have learned similar lessons from raising children.  Note that it does not demand, expect, or define the impossibility of "perfect parenting".  It is more aligned with recognizing what can and should be done as soon as possible after recognizing what needs to be achieved in a more effective way, then communicating that to one another within the family.  Otherwise uncontrolled passive and aggressive damaging pride and ego show up to control unhealthy discussions and unhealthy outcomes. 

The interview addresses race, but is not only about race, not only about raising children.  It is about healthy approaches to family relationships within an unavoidable societal framework while working to improve the environment created by that framework.  It is about approaches that are based on respecting what is important in the lives of everyone in the family, of every age.  That is how each person in the family grows and evolves instead of derailing, obstructing, and limiting one another.  It is also about how to avoid being driven by unresolved traumas from the past, and the need to recognize problems children are struggling with which they do not yet have the skills to effectively communicate; sometimes about what parents want to resist hearing that the child does communicate clearly.

Dr. Baxley emphasizes the need to effectively communicate in ways that allow and encourage personal  autonomy for everyone in the family.  It can keep a family together instead of not recognizing the need for personal autonomy within the family, and life in general, which drives a family apart when it goes unrecognized.  She emphasizes that family issues truly are dependent on the ability of the adults to always choose love so that it is possible and mandatory for everyone in the family to listen, understand, and want to communicate in ways that are not damaging.

Adults model attitudes, and behaviors, of course, whether or not they realize it, which is a primary way children learn values and character.  But children also have a strong innate sense that leads them to avoid what is dysfunctional in the form of hypocritical double standards - when possible.  When not possible it messes them up.  As children move further away from childhood towards being adults, punishing them for wanting to get out of the line of fire when the adults in their lives are struggling with their own problems, messes them up.  Children, of any age, including adult children, can not resolve their parents struggles for them, and can not be held responsible to their own extreme detriment, for causing or resolving the struggles of their parents. 

When not raised in an overwhelming emotionally unhealthy codependent way, children are a source of strength in a family, including as adults.  That natural strength as a part of the family and extended family of which they are part, is directly proportional to the emotional health of the family in which they are raised.  The ability to survive and recognize whatever unhealthy aspects of family life messed them up is vital if they are to rise above the same struggles as adults and not pass them on to their own families.

It is  a process.  It is life.  Everyone deserves better in life than to become stuck in a morose of unhealthy emotional conflict.  It is our job to create emotionally healthy sustaining families as the key to moving beyond whatever past damage may have messed us up; whatever might create future struggles, no matter the composition and size of a family - from one, to global, to galactic. 

We are souls in human form who are connected to the universe.  Not recognizing that in one's own children or in oneself when it is at the core of the innate being of our species, messes us all up.  It is not o.k. to punish children for being autonomous and not fitting in with our plans for them.  It messes them up when we do not choose to learn who they are.  We owe children a stable emotional foundation, so they can find their ways in life without doing harm to themselves or others.  We can not do that as well as they deserve when we avoid recognizing and healing our own emotional wounds.  If we do not our children will unnecessarily suffer from the same, indirectly, which will manifest in their lives too, through no fault of their own.  

It is said that when we heal our own emotional wounds we heal those of our ancestors as well, so that what we pass on to the children are the positive values of family and culture which we actively transmit to them as tradition.  I believe that from personal observation and experience, hoping it is possible for that blessing to manifest in the lives of everyone.